V22Guy said:Luke...Todd.....I would like to keep this constructive.
In my research today, I found lots of different packages for the Canon 20D; for example:
Canon 20D via Bizrate and Costco
An example package for the Nikon D70:
Bizrate
It seems as though the Nikon is a bit less expensive compared to the 20D. So my question to you pros is: is that extra 2 MP and burst capability worth the additional expense?
I am going tomorrow after work to go "touch and feel" some cameras.
Paul I learned a long time ago buying computers to always get as much as you can possibly afford. Going for the cheapest computer that is being closed out isn't always as good of deal in the long run as you think it is. I use this same philosophy buying camera's. I want to get the most camera I can possibly afford....even if I have to save a little longer.
Looking and reading reviews about the new Nikon D-200 it looks like Nikon might have finally gotten it right with their new pro-sumer release...but if you don't have Nikon glass already then Canon 20d is a better deal...even though the D-200 will come down in price over the next few months I'm sure.
The D-70 as an avid amateur will more than meet all your requirements though...this I can pretty much promise you. Even the thing I was bitching about the sync-cord and battery grip cord can be over come very easy with a $40 dollar adapter for studio strobes.
The Nikon D-70 is a starter SLR that simple and would be an awesome camera to learn digital on. If you have the money go with a Canon 20d or a Nikon D200...if not than again a D70 is plenty of camera for the price.