Let's talk guns for Birds

K

Kyle

Guest
Yeah as far as pumps go I like the old ones. Its hard to say , that could be a high end gun that was made for sears.. All that really matters it that its smooth to you and you are affective with it... I am partial I know but the model 37 is still the smoothest out of the box pump I have had in hand. YOu would have to run many rounds through the others to catch up with how slick the action works...
 

john

Well-known member
Eric N. said:
I hear alot of you.. Thanks for the links. I see most of you have a number of guns for different types of birds.. I'm looking for a one gun does it all OK maybe not perfect type of thing.. Kind of like the Disco version of a shotgun. Does a bunch of different things well, not perfectly, but not crappy either..

sbe-small-guns.jpg


How about the Benelli Super Black Eagle? I've always thought the SBE was the quintessential jack-of-all-trades shotgun. It has a 3.5" chamber so you can use it on waterfowl and turkey, but it also reliably cycles Federal Target 2.75 loads for bopping around around at the clay target range. It basically works reliably with all standard 12-gauge ammunition except for the very light target loads.

Interchangeable chokes are a given on an all-rounder. The Benelli uses the same chokes as the Berettas, and thus choke tubes abound. Even speciality chokes like the Patternmaster chokes are very common. Even rifled chokes exist for the SBE in case you want to make a wannabe Paradox. All of the specialty choke makers like Briley make Benelli/Beretta chokes.

The SBE features barrel interchangeability, so you're not married to a particular barrel length should you change your mind. You can even fit a rifled barrel with 3" chamber if you want. Another advantage of the SBE is that the upper receiver is integral with the barrel, so you can even change sighting systems with each barrel change. If you use an optical sight with your rifled barrel, that sight comes off the gun with your rifled barrel. The telescope also remains zeroed to that particular barrel and there is no slop between the telescope/mounts/receiver/barrel. If you want a ghost-ring aperture for your Armageddon barrel, that sight comes off with the barrel as well. The receiver design is very versatile and one thing that separates the SBE from the Super 90.

The SBE can even be fitted with an extension magazine if you like. The standard Benelli extension magazine threads onto the SBE's magazine. Get another barrel 18" long and you have the beginnings of a very nice combat shotgun.

The SBE's buttstock is adjustable for drop, which is another nice feature.

There is no gas system to clean or O-rings to crap out. The inertia-locking mechanism is very simple and very robust. The SBE is much easier to disassemble and clean than a pump.

To me, a huge advantage of the Benelli system is that cycling the action does not release a round from the magazine. Dropping the hammer is what release the topmost round onto the shell lifter. This means that you can change the round in the chamber or unload the chamber very easily. Try this with other shotguns and see what you get. If your Benelli is loaded with 00 Buck and a long shot presents itself, pull the action open and insert a slug and the magazine remains unaffected. Try that with an 870. If you reach a fence and you want to unload the chamber only, pull the action open and empty the chamber, and the magazine remains unaffected. (If you want to release the topmost shell in the magazine, there is also a little trip lever on the side of the trigger guard that releases the topmost round onto the shell lifter. Thus, you can store the shotgun with a full magazine and a round on the shell lifter, and the weapon will chamber when you cycle the action manually.)

The SBE is a very light gun (by autoloading standards). The bolt head locks into the barrel extension, which means the receiver is free of locking stresses and can be made from aluminum. I like the balance and feel on the SBE and Super 90 a lot.

You're not married to your stocks. You can purchase wood or plastic to suit your preferences or the environment. You can even use the pistol-grip buttstock on from the Super 90 if you're into such things.

The only thing I dislike about the SBE is the BB safety on the trigger guard. Yuck! I'm a tang safety kind of guy, but am not willing to lower myself to Mossberg levels to get one.

The SBE is a very nice shotgun and a superb all-rounder. Check it out.
 
K

Kyle

Guest
Actualy you can change the shell in the tube on the 390 beretta the same way.. It wont feed unless fired... I like the benelli but if that bitch is any heavier then this Nova its out....
 

john

Well-known member
Check out:

nova-specs2.gif


sbe-specs2.gif


If we compare 12-gauge models with both 28" and 26" barrels, the SBE is actually 0.5 lbs. lighter than the Nova. Length is basically identical between the SBE and Nova.

And the SBE gives a walnut stock option, which is my personal preference. The SBE's buttstock is also adjustable, while you're stuck with what you get on the Nova. The Nova also suffers from a very long forend throw. A 3.5" repeater requires a very long forend throw to cycle the action. I would prefer an automatic, especially an automatic as elegant in function and as reliable as Benelli's inertia-locking action.

What is shockingly different is the price. The SBE lists for almost four times what the Nova costs. You gotta pay to play.

montefeltro-specs2.gif


The Montefeltro in 12-bore with 28" barrel is 0.4 lbs. lighter than the Super Black Eagle, but the Montefeltro lacks the extended magazine capability and stock compatibility with the Super 90. For example, the SureFire forend with co-axial light fits the SBE and Super 90, but not the Montefeltro. The Montefeltro also has the Super 90's receiver design where the barrel extension plugs into the receiver, and thus the SBE's versatility with different sighting options is lost. I'm just not into the Montefeltro at all. I would much prefer an SBE or a Super 90.

Also--if this even matters to you--the Montefeltro has always struck me as a wannabe classy gun with its high gloss finish and fancy walnut. To my way of looking at things, a classy repeater is basically a joke. If you want a nice gun, get a double. If you can't afford a double, stick with a workhorse repeater and be happy with what you have. Benelli also used to a offer an engraved Montefeltro with coin finish, gold engraving, polished blue, and high-gloss stock finish for the wannabe Uptown shooter. That shotgun was was every bit as ugly as it sounds.
 
K

Kyle

Guest
I have shot the Nova a little now and am still undecided on if I like it or hate it. Its pretty clunky and will probably get better with age but that freaking wieght is just a bitch... I am amazed that the auto is that much lighter.. Looks like the Montefeltro in 20 is the best bet for all day walking....
 

GregH

Well-known member
Apr 24, 2004
1,630
0
My vote is a Beretta AL391 Urika. Nice semi.

I have the 686 Onyx Jack posted above. It's a nice gun and I agree it's a good entry level O/U. If I had to do it over I'd go with the Ultralight version.
 
Last edited:

andrewv

Well-known member
John: What matters to me is my inteded use. A higher capacity magazine, different sight options and so on don't matter in the hunting world that I participate in. The Montefeltro and most other autos can carry 4 in the mag and 1 in the chamber, but if DOW catches you without the plug, you will pay to play ($200 ticket here) :D
 
Last edited:

john

Well-known member
Sharperover said:
John: What matters to me is my inteded use. A higher capacity magazine, different sight options and so on don't matter in the hunting world that I participate in. The Montefeltro and most other autos can carry 4 in the mag and 1 in the chamber, but if DOW catches you without the plug, you will pay to play ($200 ticket here) :D

Yeah, I realize those things don't come into play for most hunting. But the options are there if you ever want to utilize them, and you mentioned wanting a shotgun that could do everything fairly well--an "all around" shotgun. For example, let's say you get a SBE with walnut stocks and 26" barrel with vent rib. You can adjust the buttstock for drop for cast, and then fit the gun to you. You might not achieve a perfect fit, but at least you will be able to tweak the buttstock a little to your liking. You can't do this with most guns. That gun will serve you well for your wingshooting. You can hammer waterfowl with the 3.5" loads, you can shatter clay targets with 2.75" target loads, etc. You can plug the magazine easily for hunting. Benelli sells plugs or you can make your own out of maple dowel.

I mention the other interchangeability features because some people actually use them. For example, aren't deer hunters on the east coast relegated to using shotguns with slugs? If you wanted, you could fit a rifled choke tube and create a wannabe Holland's Paradox or a Westley Richards Explora. If you wanted a rifled barrel, you could fit a rifled barrel with 3" chamber. Benelli offers this for the SBE. If you can't use metallic sights for whatever reason or you hunt in low light, you could fit an optical sight to the upper receiver on the SBE, which is part of the barrel extension and removes when you remove the barrel. A problem with other shotguns is that when you mount a telescope onto the receiver, the telescope stays on the gun when you remove the barrel. This necessitates quickly detachable telescope mounts and the mounts are unsightly on the gun when the telescope is removed and the shotgun is used for wingshooting. Or, you can remove the mounts entirely and have four threaded holes in the top of your receiver, which looks like ass. Also, you would have to zero your telescope once again when you remounted the telescope. And these systems with the telescope mounted on the receiver and the barrel loose inside the receiver have never provided satisfactory accuracy.

For whatever reason, some turkey hunters like using pistol-grip buttstocks. The SBE permits you to do this, as the SBE accepts the same buttstock as the Super 90. The Super 90 is mostly geared for the tactical/military crowd, and so things like pistol-grip buttstocks and co-axial lights abound for the Super 90. These things fit on the SBE because the Super 90 and SBE share the exact same stocks.

The idea of a co-axial light on a hunting gun isn't as funky as it sounds. I remember in my younger days, well before co-axial lights came about, I used to a tape a Mag-Lite to my air rifle and shoot at rats that hung out in my neighbors' fruit trees. My friends and I did this at night and needed the flashlight to illuminate the rats. Peter Capstick also mentioned several times that when he had to flush out a wounded leopard at night, he would don a very thick leather jacket with steel collar, and be armed with a Winchester Model 12 with a Mag-Lite taped to it. He would use the Mag-Lite to illuminate the leopards. (Capstick is a great writer and you should read his stuff if you ever get the chance.) I don't hunt regularly, but I'm sure there are lots of co-axial light applications out there that I have no clue about. At least the SBE gives you the option of using a SureFire forend with co-axial light, the one shown here on the Super 90 entry gun shown here:

hkcatalog13_.jpg


The SBE also gives you barrel length and type options, something the double wouldn't do unless you had beaucoup money. You could easily make the SBE into a very nice combat shotgun. Just pull the 26" vent ribbed barrel and install an 18" cylinder barrel. Install a serrated ramp front sight and a ghost-ring rear sight and you have a very nice combat shotgun. Because of the SBE's upper receiver design, these sights will come off the gun with the barrel. The SBE works reliably with all buckshot loads, including the reduced buckshot loads like Federal's Tactical loads. I have also found the Super 90 is a very accurate slug shooter. I get lots of cloverleaf three-shot patterns at 50 yards with Brenneke slugs. (The Brenneke is also an excellent choice because the hulls are white, and you can differentiate between slugs and buckshot loads at a glance.) If you want, you can fit the extended magazine that is just about even with the 18" barrel, and you can fit the Surefire lighted forend. Add a sling and you have a combat shotgun supreme.

Several others here have recommended doubles. I must respectfully disagree. The double is a thing of beauty and I love it, but it is inherently weak because of its hinged breeching system. Every double I've ever shot was stiff to open after firing a slug through the gun. This is no sweat at all for a SBE, which has a rotating bolt head with opposed locking lugs. The lock-up is very strong. I never had a double come off the face, but I always got the impression that the double was just barely hanging on when I fired high-pressure rounds through it.

Also, you should beware of low-priced doubles. I've seen lots of them that didn't shoot right. They patterned funny and the barrels weren't regulated properly. Their actions also had slop in them and the lock-up wasn't nice and tight. If you have your heart set on a double (and there is absolutely nothing wrong with a double), my recommendation would be to start at the Beretta 682 or Krieghoff K-80 levels and then go up from there. I can't recommend any of the 686 series or equivalent price/quality doubles. I used to own a 686. It shot like shit, as did the others I've been lucky enough to play with.
 

Eric N.

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2004
3,980
0
Falls Church, VA
When I have hunted here in VA, MD, PA, and upstate NY (some time ago mind you) for deer I have always used a rifle not a shotgun. But, if you were using a shotgun for deer you would want to use slugs.. Would hate to see some one shooting deer with buckshot. Talk about inhumane.. I know, I know some will argue that your killing the deer so how can you talk about inhumane and killing some thing at the same time but, one shot and a quick death is much better then peppering it full of little holes and not killing it. Unless you chase it down and shoot it untill it's hamburger and even then you'd probably still going to have to plug it with a pistol. Of course I have never tried nor know of anyone that has tried to shoot deer with buckshot so I could be wrong....


Lots of good choices to go and play with though.. So please keep offering up options.. I do like the SBE suggestion very much since it seems to have loads of options that would make it a great "all a round" bird gun. The thing about weight doesn't bother me so much... If it's only 1 to 1.5 pounds difference then I don't care.. I spend half my day carrying a wiggling 22 pound little girl around so a 7 to 8 pound gun that doesn't move isn't going to be that bad for me.. Plus, I'm already used to carring an extra 75 pounds of spare tire so I think I'll be alright.. The second handers that I have always been given by my dad and my step dad have always been pretty damn heavy as it is and it never bothered me that much..

The more and more that John is talking about the SBE the more and more that I'm liking it.. I'll have to go and play with it for a while though and see.. Plus, talk to the guys at the gun store to find out what they carry for it and such.. Damn, I may even have to use this as an excuse to drive up to the new Cabelas in PA..
 
K

Kyle

Guest
http://www.ithacagun.com/product/firearms/highRes/Model37HighGrade.shtml :) And never look back...... In all seriousness though. The issue of fit while shouldering the gun (Not just standing there playing with it) is a huge deal and makes all the difference in the world when shooting jumping birds. If you stand there with eyes closed and shoulder the gun , when you open your eyes you should be looking right down the sights (If it fits right). Adjusting a stock doesnt always get this done as people are all different and thier stance is different. Yes there is a (Proper stance) but things are the way they are and having a gun fit your style is much better and more productive then you trying to fit it.
The weight is a consideration man , believe me... It affects swing and response and just about everything.. If autos are your thing either of the Two benellis mentioned or the 391 are good solid guns (Beretta offering just as much and made side by side with the benelli about 8 miles from here) and will serve you well... I dont even want to talk about the doubles in either configuration as I think its more of an image thing then anything else. A guy with a double is consistently going to get his ass handed to him when shooting side by side with someone shooting a gun with three rounds. Its just the basic law of averages...
 

Eric N.

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2004
3,980
0
Falls Church, VA
I hear ya.. That's why I'm going to go and shoot these a few times and see what works best for me.. I was just looking to thin the herd of choices down to a few instead of just starting at one brand and going to the next. That could take forever.. Yes, I have wished on many a time that I have that third round.. Though I have seen my stepdad get a shells out and in there pretty damn quick, I'm just not that fast.. Of course I guess if you have used the gun forever that would probably help.. Though I wouldn't mind a nice light gun, I won't just make my choice off of weight. Yes, how it fits though will play a big role.. If it's not going to fit me right then I don't want it.
 

JSQ

Well-known member
Apr 21, 2004
3,259
1
44
San Diego, CA
My experience isn't exactly that I've had my "ass handed" to me when I shoot with autoloaders. I am yet to spend an a day afield with an autoloader where they averaged fewer shots per bird and more birds bagged then I did. More so it means that if I'm going to miss badly my embarassment is limited to two misses whereas my friend can bang away thrice and look that much more a fool.
Whatismore, most serious wingshooters spend quite a bit of time discussing/arguing about choke. Why? Because it's very important. It's the reason we use shotguns to knock birds out of the air. The inherent superiority of the double comes from the ability to select choke not just for a given outing, but for a given shot. It's no trick to master either. To most the selection of barrels becomes instinctive rather quickly. For those who really tailor their shooting you have the option of firing two different shells in either barrel with appropriate shot sizes and dram for the closer or farther shot.

I a can appreciate John's desire to have all of his guns do "double duty" but for most the reality is that their birdgun will never actually be used for defense and that its not a consideration for the dedicated wingshooter. Many people have suggested advantages for types of hunting other than birds. Turkey is big game, it isn't even the same ballpark, it's not even the same sport, but you are using a shotgun so I suppose you can factor that. However, the addition of a light, telescope or ghostring sights aren't really applicable to the wingshooter. And what about the ability to handle a man or beast stopping load? Are you going to put a slug or buckshot through your gun? In the extreme circumstance you can put a 2.75" hi brass buckshot load through a modern light 12 sxs without ill effect. A full on 3" slug in most O/Us. Many bird hunters carry two shells of this type for coyotes, mountain lions, etc in the event they need to use them. If they have to they will be fine. The recoil may be unpleasant and the gun might be difficult to open, but it will do. In addition there is no easier configuration with which to switch shells between firing than a double. But to me these considerations aren't really relevant when weighed agains the advantages of a gun designed for it's purpose. Doubles are superior in the field because that is what they are designed for. They never have a crossbolt safety, they offer multiple chokes, they swing nicely, they reload easily, they are made safe with one motion and they eject or extract shells in a manner which is conducive to proper stewardship of the land you hunt.
The SBE can do many things, but if you narrow the list to the considerations of a birdhunter a double does all of those things better.

First and foremost, it swings, shoots and patterns better. It will generally have a superior trigger and in the case of DT an articulated front. Two chokes means selective pattern and that means versatile shooting as I explained above. This is the number one reason to carry a double in the field. It's not just about style or tradition, selective choke is an edge and experience all in itself. As for capcity: Two shots ought to be enough for the practiced wingshooter. Especially for the upland hunter, by the time you can or would take a third shot it probably isn't appropriate. If you can't bring a single bird down (including a cripple) with two shots you need to improve your shooting. If you're trying to bang away and bring down three birds on a covey rise you need to calm down and relax. Mostly this is applicable to upland but I think it's a logic that also serves well relative to waterfowl.

Second, the break action means the gun can easily be put in a state of complete safety with the same simple step you take to reload it. I cross plenty of barbed wire fences while hunting. I've probably done it 30 times already this season. My usual hunting partner has an autoloader. A benelli Super 90 to be exact. Every time I cross a fence, I just break my gun and over I go knowing that the gun is properly safe. It is no where as easy for my friend to remove a shell from the chamber, even with the superior benelli design, and as a consequence he frequently doesn't bother.

Third, the same friend consequently struggles with the akward safety whereas my tang is convenient and natural. Often times the same friend simply leaves his safety off because it presents such a problem to him. I urge him not do so but sometimes he does. Is he not the safety itself? Can the gun be made safe by the manner in which it is carried? Sure, but using the mechanical safety is just a nice precaution that make me feel better. Any experienced birdhunter has taken a spill be it sliding down a slope or falling out of a boat or stumbling in a blind. When that happens, the mechanical safety counts.

Fourth, Autoloaders spit shells. Pumps do as well. When I hunt I don't leave trash. I even pick up my wads when I see them. Spent shells are trash and you should take them home with you. Don't leave them in the brush and don't drop them in the water. I prefer my field gun to have extractors for just this reason, but even on a double with ejectors the shooter can easily break the gun with the trigger/toplever hand and then catch both shells with the same hand and pop them into the back of your vest. Not possible in any way with an autoloader or pump. Either you're searching around bent over for your shells or you leave them like a slob.

Fifth, fit is also important and most doubles can be bought right off the shelf in a variety of measurements. The same gun is readily sold in a number of proportions. Most really decent doubles will be custom tailored to begin with. A gun made to fit you, or even ordered within the range of your fit is always going to be closer to perfect than an adjustable system with an inherently limited range of manipulation. For this reason you need to SHOOT whatever gun you buy beforehand if you fall at all outside the norm for gun fit. Whether you get a double or otherwise there will still be many different options and some will provide a far more natural fit beyond the technical advantages of they shooting system.

Think about what you are buying. Is it a birdgun or is it just an all around tool? If it's just a gun for all purposes (hunting, target, defense, armageddon, etc.) then get whatever. Anything that puts lead in the air will work in a scope that broad. There may be a best choice (SBE?) but the range is so broad you can't give much weight to a single arena such as wingshooting. If this is going to be a field gun then look to how, when and where you will use it. What features will give you the most utility for it's intended purpose? Decide that and then make your choice.
 
Last edited:

john

Well-known member
http://www.ithacagun.com/product/firearms/highRes/Model37HighGrade.shtml

Kyle, you're still killing me with that Odysseus wanna go home Uptown wannabe piece of shit. I can't believe you of all people, with your discriminating taste, like that High Grade. It's hideous. I think that High Grade has got to be the Colt Python of the shotgun world.

Let's take a look at that High Grade and see what we find. Let's start from back to front.

The recoil pad is not functional and hideously ugly. Right off the bat, I can tell the designer of that High Grade is not a shooter. Why? Look at the hell and toe of that recoil pad. They're very pointed and snag on speed mounts and snap shots. The heel of a recoil pad should be rounded to facilitate a speed mount. I even like the toe to be rounded slightly to facilitate a speed mount when you have the shotgun pointed down and the buttstock above your shoulder (like on an indoor ready position). Also, the vents in the recoil pad tend to collect trash in the field. I prefer a closed recoil pad, which works every bit as well. And I the only one who thinks that recoil pad looks like the WWII Japanese flag? Here is a much more functional and nicer looking recoil pad:

4728.jpg


That's the Pachmayr Sporting Clays pad. It's a very effective recoil pad and tames recoil nicely. There are no open vents on the sides so it doesn't collect trash. The heel and toe are rounded slightly and the heel even has a hard insert to prevent the heel from snagging during a speed mount. Pachmayr even makes an all-black version so the insert is pretty much invisible.

Next, that High Grade's stock is just nasty. That fiddleback pattern in the grain is just hideous. I love nice wood, but I dislike fancy wood. And what's with the epoxied gloss finish that is about 3mm thick? It looks so cheap. You can even see how thick the coating is just by looking at that pic. The gloss and grain together remind me of some bowling ball. This stock would probably make you the envy of Cletus and the other yokuls at the local bowling alley.

And look at the fit of the recoil pad to the stock. That's "High Grade?" It's so uneven. I think that stock needs a white line spacer in there to even out the fit. The white spacer would look just "right" with the rest of the gun.

The gold trigger is a nice feature and adds just the right "touch of class" to that gun. It'll match one's gold teeth.

Maybe it's the lighting in the pic, but the receiver appears to be semi-gloss in shine while the barrel and magazine are glossy blue. But let's ignore that mis-match for now. The bigger thing for me is the glossy blue. I hate glossy blue. It's so trashy. It's about as elegant as a glossy stock. I've always liked the subdued look of rust blue. That would be too expensive for a production gun, but a microblasted finish with hot blue looks almost as good. Anything but glossy would be better.

I'll bet that High Grade's extra finish work is all on the outside. That is, nothing is done inside the gun to make it function better. I'll bet the interior bearing surfaces are not polished and the operating cams not radiused for smoother operation. All the work is on the outside only I think.

A standard grade Model 37 would be nicer I think. And I thought the Montefeltro was trying to Uptown. LOL.