HunterAK said:Unless she's learned how to clone herself and wear a damn good disguise, her "aide" is not her. Sorry buddy. Doesn't mean JACK.
Erm... I'm not sure I can swallow that argument.
As employees, are they not performing duties as directed? Or perhaps living up to strongly implied expectations? Or what... they just wanted to make their boss happy, and thought that would be a great way to do it? Don't tell me... a completely innocent coincidence?
OK, so lets suppose she didn't do anything personally, but her underlings did. Come on... that would still be suspicious behavior. Plausible deniability at best. Possibly by design... that is standard procedure for playing dirty. Get the pawns to do what you want, but keep your own nose clean.
Now, I'm not saying I'm decided as to whether or not she did something wrong here. It looks fishy to me, but I'm not gonna argue it because nobody actually knows yet.
But sorry... investigation that leads to the people that rely on her for their income DOES mean jack. Because that is how it is done, by those who know how it is done. If anything it might make a person more nervous. (By demonstrating that if she IS playing dirty... she's GOOD at it.)