Oh, give me a break. Lots of people were yelling about how unbelievable the movies were when they were actually released. Critics and viewers alike. If that is why they are supposed to be bad, my point was to suggest that they are actually quite accurate depictions of human behavior.
It couldn't be the acting, as that was spot on in both films. Couldn't be the cinematography, either, because it was epic in scope and application. The sound and music were exemplary in both films as well. It couldn't be the characters, you had everything people require in a cast of characters.
The reluctant hero
The woman you know he is going to get in the end
The powerful antagonist
The weak masses
The quirky character that the hero deals with regularly
It had to be the plot that people hated. I'm just showing that the plot is not as far-fetched as many might believe. One movie is about communication and community. Another is about breaking away from dying ideals to forge a new future. Both movies are equally relevant, and deal with the difficulty in determining just what is right, and what is wrong.
It had to be the plot. Or was it just that people didn't like seeing themselves for what they truly are?
Cheers,
Kennith