Maybe I'm overstepping my bounds here but I'll forge ahead anyway. Seems like the good folks at Land Rover are misjudging the US market. First they killed off the Defender due to poor sales. However I think the poor sales were due to the 90 inch wheelbase. If I recall correctly one year Land Rover imported 500 110 inch Defenders and all of them we're sold before they got here. Seems to me like the 110 was the way to go. Then the Range Rover got progressively lower and the rims seemed to grow and the tire sidewall seemed to shrink. Now the Disco is gone, personally I think its a cool rig and should still be made. It's capable and comfortable without being totally over the top in either department. Land Rover seemed to really go downhill with the Freelander, I've driven a few at LR dealerships when the have the demo days with the obstacle course. They're surprisingly capable however they don't look it. Kinda look like a luxed up RAV4. The new LR3 I haven't driven yet so all I know about it is what I read in Truck Trend. TT seems to think its a capable wheeler but is overpriced, has way too many gadgets, and looks too bling off the showroom floor. Jeep and Dodge have exploited the off-road market by offering vehicles like the Dodge Power Wagon and the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon. Land Rover on the other hand seems to be gearing up to compete in the H2 dominated bling market. Thats a shame considering what fine vehicles they sell overseas. Sort of like the watered down version of the Mercedes Benz Unimog Freightliner is selling in the US. Overseas manufacturers underestimate the off-road market here, and very few domestic manufacturers are recognizing us. So for now we'll soldier on with our old junk. Wheeling a 30 year old plus rig may not be easy but at least I'm having fun doing it.