About to buy a TJM front bumper

mikem

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2004
172
0
Superior, CO
Snwbord24 said:
I guess what I'm saying is that if the bumper has been tested and rated for up to a 12k lb winch then the crush cans should hold up just fine using the recovery points. Does this make sense?

That seems like a reasonable assumption.

Is the winch bolted to the frame at all?
 

Sharkman

Active member
Jul 30, 2004
28
0
Michigan
GuntherRocks said:
I watched a guy get his TJM bumper bent up fairly well since there were not any recovery points on it when he went on the outing with us.

Garrett, That sounds like an exciting story! I seem to remember that guy ;) The new recover points mounted to the winch tray are working out great. Luckily the only part that bent was the panel that gets discarded when the winch tray is added.....Where where you last Saturday??

Steve
 

MUSKYMAN

Well-known member
Apr 19, 2004
8,277
0
OverBarrington IL
\quote:Quote:
Originally Posted by Snwbord24
I guess what I'm saying is that if the bumper has been tested and rated for up to a 12k lb winch then the crush cans should hold up just fine using the recovery points. Does this make sense?

That seems like a reasonable assumption.

Is the winch bolted to the frame at all?


this is not true...a winch loads up smoothly to peak pull where a strap or chain(bad idea) causes a huge spike in load exerted onto a recovery point.
 
S

Snwbord24

Guest
If you jerk the crap out of it, I completely agree. If not, it shouldn't be an issue. I've had it tugged pretty hard with no problems so far.

I also have 2 recovery points up there so if I need to be jerked slightly I can double up and spread the initial shock to both instead of just one. That way the load is shared by both crush cans.

I know there are cons to what I did, all I can say is that I thought about them and don't think they're as bad as everyone thinks they are if you don't go crazy using them. I know there are limitations to them.

And definately no chain on them.
 

RotorRover

New member
Aug 30, 2004
3
0
Discokayaker, regarding my concern that the CM hooks attached at the winch tray would limit recovery options, you are right that it is probably unfounded. I imagined a scenario where the recovery would be needed from a vehicle elevated quite a bit in front of the "victom". Given that the hooks are mounted below and well behind the leading edge of the bumper I don't want to risk having the bumper take the stress of the vehicle's weight given that the only point it attaches to the frame is the crush cans. But I have not been able to guage what the actual clearance angle is. One response indicates that it caused only damage to the "knock-out" plate where the tray would be installed.

Any other personal feedback is appreciated.
 

Loydster

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2004
685
1
Loydster said:
I am also considering the TJM bumper. Has anyone welded the crush cans and then added recovery points.

Any thoughts on this idea. I am not so worried about the airbag but i dont care for the looks of the rovertym bumper that much.

Thanks for any input

so anyone wanna give me their opinion on this idea good or bad
 

Ron L

Well-known member
Mar 30, 2004
194
0
52
SoCal
I am trying to understand something here. Its safe/strong enough to mount a winch on there but not safe or strong enough for a recovery point?

Last time I looked at the crush cans on my ARB they were engineered to crush not stretch. I cant possibly understand under proper and safe recovery how a quality recovery point that is installed properly on any bumper would have an effect on the crush can itself. Given the mentioned circumstances here the thickness in crush can material alone would have me worry about the mounting point on the frame more than anything else.
 

Discokayaker

Well-known member
Apr 23, 2004
85
0
Danville, CA
Ron. . .on the TJM bumper the winch is mounted to a separate tray that is bolted directly to the frame. Most will then mount recovery points to this tray. Don't know about the ARB though.

Lance
 
S

Snwbord24

Guest
The ARB winch box is integrated in the bumper, not seperately attached to the frame. From reading this thread, the TJM isn't. I'd have to take a good first hand look at the TJM to see if I'd add recovery points to that bumper.

As for the ARB, I'm perfectly content with the recovery points I mounted. I completely agree with you Ron.
 

stansell

Well-known member
Jun 14, 2004
364
0
51
Norfolk, VA
Ryan,
I am thinking about the TJM (I have been waffling on a front bumper for months). Meet your expectatoins? Also, how does the approach angle compare with the ARB?

BTW, I am also thinking that the crush cans should be alright since winching is pretty similar to pulling so long as the guy pulling doesn't 'make a run at it'. Shane just had his ARB yanked on reasonably hard this last weekend with no ill effects.
 

Jaime

Well-known member
Apr 29, 2004
641
0
NJ
I can't think of a bumper with a worse approach angle than an ARB. I know...I have an ARB.
 

johnnyx

Active member
Discokayaker said:
Ron. . .on the TJM bumper the winch is mounted to a separate tray that is bolted directly to the frame. Most will then mount recovery points to this tray. Don't know about the ARB though.

Lance

Does anyone know where I can find a pic of this seperate tray mentioned for the TJM? I can't seem to find one anywhere on the web.

I may be able to pick up one used locally and need to know what it looks like so I can be sure it will work with a TJM (T17) - http://www.tellico4x4.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/85_2339_1115/products_offroad/15251.

http://www.tellico4x4.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_offroad/9514

I already own an M8000 - just need a bumper/mount to go with it. :D

Thx!
 

Reed

Well-known member
Apr 20, 2004
148
0
75
Bonny Doon, CA
Snwbord24 said:
The ARB winch box is integrated in the bumper, not seperately attached to the frame.

I have a D1 with a newly installed airbag compatile ARB. On that model the winch basket mounts to the frame with the same bolts that mount the cans on. I would then say that it is mounted to the frame. Other models may vary.

Recovery point wise, I used to have two JATE rings mounted on the frame. With the ARB and the winch tray, the JATE rings do not have enough clearance between the hinge points. Maybe a little judicious shaving might get them to fit again. But that is about 3/8 to 1/4 inch of metal to remove frome the JATE ring. How much will that compromise their integrity.

My next favorite idea would be the hooks mounted to the frame. I know I am walking into the fiery furnace here, but an open hook just doesn't look as strong or as safe as a closed loop. So until someone bludgeons me with facts, they are not my favorite.

Mounting the recovery points to the front of the bumper looks cool, and is sure convienient when buried up to the ... bumber... in mud, but these are dependent on the streangth of the cans. Objects that look, and may operate like two accordions. )If you can push them, you can also pull them.), and are designed to... well, FAIL. that is the whole reason they are there. I don't mean that the cans would break, but they could stretch. This could ad inches to my Disco's overall length, and ruin the already discussed "lousy" approach angle.

I guess I'll keep filing down my Jate rings, and avoiding places I know will require recovery for my truck. :cool:

-Reed
 

stansell

Well-known member
Jun 14, 2004
364
0
51
Norfolk, VA
Ryan,

Just curious if you had found a good place to put a recovery point on the TJM bumper. I am getting antsy about getting a new bumper for my rig, but definitely want good recovery points.

Rob
 

rmuller

Well-known member
Apr 28, 2004
4,452
1
Northern NJ
www.njlr.org
I actually haven't done it yet due to a major financial hit (moving. ugh), but I decided that the best way would be to get the winch mount (~130 or so), and put the hooks on it.. it seems like that is what most people are doing with the TJM bumper.. i'd prefer to just have a mounting point for two d-shackles on the front of the bumper, but I think the alternative is a stronger method.