95 RRC Shocke With EAS

silvermax

Active member
Oct 21, 2013
37
0
walnut creek
Curious what options are for a 95 RRC With fully functioning air suspension. Seems on the AB site that most say... For Vehicles without Air Suspension?

Any guidance would be great
 

57loboy

Well-known member
Oct 17, 2007
913
4
Fairfield County, CT
I used the OEM Woodhead shocks in my first LWB that still had the EAS in it. Got them from AB and they rode nice with the EAS. It wouldn't surprise me too if the Bilsteins and such are not recommended because they are too stiff for the EAS setup.
 

Paul Grant

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2004
3,180
0
CT
Curious what options are for a 95 RRC With fully functioning air suspension. Seems on the AB site that most say... For Vehicles without Air Suspension?

Any guidance would be great

The reason why they call for different shocks for EAS equipped trucks is that, due to the relocation of the front shock mounts outside the coils, the length of the shock is different.
 

Paul Grant

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2004
3,180
0
CT
I was thinking about it and realized I have a fairly new pair of front Bilsteins sitting on the shelves. They were taken off an EAS equipped truck. I'm pretty sure the rears are the same regardless of EAS or no EAS. So, I guess, with the market for EAS front shocks being as small as it is, the only company still offering them is Woodhead.
 

p m

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 19, 2004
15,645
869
58
La Jolla, CA
www.3rj.org
I had stock-size Bilsteins on an EAS Classic, including the fronts. Many shocks can be used on EAS trucks in front, including TerraFirma.
 

Paul Grant

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2004
3,180
0
CT
I won't deny that there are plenty of shocks that will "fit" but back in the day when people like OME and Bilstein were THE aftermarket choice, those companies offered unique front shocks for EAS equipped trucks. I doubt they still do.
 

Paul Grant

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2004
3,180
0
CT
I agree with you Peter, I'm just saying that Bilstein (and probably Woodhead) made front shocks that were specifically for EAS equipped RRC's. I have a set of Bilsteins on hand and the numbers stamped on them are different than those for DI's and non EAS RRC's. My point is that they probably stopped making the EAS specific shock and it's likely other manufacturers have as well. So when you do a search for shocks for EAS equipped RRC's it may seem that the selection is limited.
 

p m

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 19, 2004
15,645
869
58
La Jolla, CA
www.3rj.org
The only difference I can remember being the length of the studs... and you are correct on the different part numbers.
Not sure if it's a bad or good thing that Bilstein and OME dropped the ball on those - I like TF shocks on my white D1.
 

silvermax

Active member
Oct 21, 2013
37
0
walnut creek
Awesome, thanks for the responses. Now knowing this, which would you recommend between the brands and why?

@Paul Grant do you happen to know which model Bilsteins they are?
 

robisonservice

Well-known member
It's been my experience that the forward mounting location of the air suspension shocks puts more stress on the shocks bodies. When the vehicles are run hard on rough roads we saw quite a few Bilsteins snap off. They warranted them, but we learned that Bilsteins did not do well in the forward location on terrain. That is why they push the relocation kits and we move the shocks back to the traditional inside-coil location if we do a coil conversion now.
 

silvermax

Active member
Oct 21, 2013
37
0
walnut creek
So I got a new set of front OME N45F for too cheap to pass up, will these work fine with
EAS and are they a much stiffer shock?

Lastly any good recommendations for the rears...stick with OME or ?