Search results

  1. p m

    2013 Land Rover LR4 HSE LUX HD Package 5L V8 asking $19000 OBO

    Shit, it may mean I need to redo ours soon.
  2. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    LOL That 9000 mile photo I took at 62 mph was on a busy freeway merge, driving in a right-most lane that's about to end, between a whitehair in a Buick and a garbage truck. But, speaking of the F150 gas mileage - is it measured at the pump or calculated by the ECU?
  3. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    Only 91+. It is a high-compression, turbocharged engine - it would likely kill the boost and retard the ignition if it ever heard detonation.
  4. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    The obvious joke would be "I take the Fifth," but the truth is that in most cases I am a ~90-percentile driver (excluding driving in carpool/express lane when the rest of the traffic is jammed). The I-15 dips in that plot are in Utah (where speed limit is 80, and even the big rigs drive 5-10...
  5. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    I started logging the gas pump numbers at mile 870; the odometer is incredibly accurate, within 0.1-0.2%. Here's the gas mileage record up to ~9000 miles yesterday: The total mileage in the log divided by the pump gallon numbers total is 14.0092 mpg. Everything above 14mpg mark is country roads...
  6. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    IIRC, they claimed 15.5 - which I just couldn't see achievable, so 14 is okay.
  7. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    14
  8. p m

    INEOS Grenadier

    9k miles in 160 days of ownership... I need to drive my Classic more.
  9. p m

    Whats the 4HP22 max power rating?

    Read again, 370kmi. The truck's at 387kmi now.
  10. p m

    New Land Cruiser

    from the standpoint of average under-axle clearance across entire track.
  11. p m

    New Land Cruiser

    Before the $76k Grenadier, the choice of LR4 and 385-kmi Classic pushed us to rent a Suburban or a Tahoe or a Wagoneer on a few recent cross-country trips. Wagoneer was the oddest of the bunch - with ridiculous gas mileage (22 mpg on a 2800-mile trip), but it earned nobody's love. Compared to...
  12. p m

    How bad is the 5.0?

    I am sure they gave the big boys slightly better stuff; but, since in 2010 LR wasn't even aware of the issue, I don't think early ones had anything different. FWIW, the frequency of 2.7/3.0 diesel crankshaft failures overseas for D3/D4/RRS is about the same.
  13. p m

    How bad is the 5.0?

    IIRC, I took the LR4 in for chain tensioners around 155kmi, owned the truck since 17kmi and changed oil at about 5kmi intervals. I don't think one's got ear good enough to hear chain clatter over high-pressure fuel pumps - their sound is dominant, in and out of the cabin. Mine didn't make any...
  14. p m

    How bad is the 5.0?

    Chain: I know of two mechanically-inclined and attentive people with well, meticulously, maintained LR4 and RRS, who experienced a timing chain skip - in one case, the engine was done in, and LR4 sold for scrap value. In another, somehow, the engine survived but required about 8k in parts and...
  15. p m

    Whats the 4HP22 max power rating?

    I now have a tally of two 4HP22s going tits up in 95 Classics, both behind 3.9s, one - at 220kmi, another - 370kmi. 32% more torque than a 3.9, in a vehicle that's 12% heavier... What could go wrong?
  16. p m

    How bad is the 5.0?

    Basically.... There is no warning whatsoever before timing chains skip in 5.0 (3.0 is the same, for that matter). It runs beautifully, and then in a split second it's not worth its weight in aluminum. I caught a cam-related code in our LR4 completely by a chance - while showing the tester to my...
  17. p m

    How bad is the 5.0?

    Links to Facebook almost never work.
  18. p m

    New Land Cruiser

    You're welcome.