I agree 500 is steep, but the guy is supposed to be making them by hand, so I suppose it makes sense that way.
I can't dig hollow handles. They are weak and unbalanced. As well, the saw on the spines of these kinds of knives is fairly useless, compared to what you can achieve by laying the blade along a piece of wood and striking the spine with a log, a process known as batoning. It sounds like silly survivalist nonsense, but it the way things have been done for thousands of years.
I can't think of anything I long to store in a hollow handle, nothing at all, that is worth the penalty in strength and balance. That particular blade doesn't have enough meat to be of much use, and is of a profile that is not ideal for durability. One cannot beat on the spine, nor readily use the flat as an impact tool itself. The saw is not worth these compromises, in my opinion. In all my trips into the wild, I have never once wished my knife had a saw on the back. I have never once wished for a saw period, actually.
Their "trapper" model appears decent enough, but I don't like stag handles, and at 415 dollars, I'll stick with the farce Grylls knife for a few dollars more.
I have been seriously looking around for something as good as this stupid Bear knife since I found it. I've checked many custom makers, some I know, some I don't, and most of the good production facilities. For an infinitely useful, practically simple field and survival utility knife, I am having a hard time finding it's superior, assuming it is as good as it looks, which I think it is.
That is, of course, not considering a good Bowie, axe, or machete. Each will outperform such a knife in many areas, but I already have those. I want to learn to rely on something more compact, so my big blades become more of a luxury.
I might just have to try and buy one of those damned farce knives. I wonder if the guy will leave Bear's name off of it for me.
Cheers,
Kennith