HunterAK said:
Jammin... no, no, no....
You can't write a real review, even on here, if you just heard bits and pieces on the radio man.
Weak, lame, inane, and droning on and on like she was talking to 1st graders is so far off base it's almost comical.
Come back after you've WATCHED and heard the speech from start to finish, not in pieces.
That was not a review, and didn't claim to be. That was exactly my impression of the first part of it, with the disclaimer that it obviously could not apply to the entire speech.
FWIW, I've now read a transcript... I had heard it from the beginning up until she mentioned Truman, and got absolutely nothing out of it. (It did get much better shortly after that, at least on paper.)
Thing is I've gotten 10 times more out of 2 minutes of Ron Paul or Bob Barr (and others) than she gave me in that 10 minutes or so, and I honestly felt like screaming at the radio for her to knock it off with the pandering and get on with the meat already. It felt like padding, and a waste of time.
The rest was much better, just as I said it probably was. As written, there was some darn good stuff, some bs, some funny, some disingenuous.
I stand by my statement on the first part of the speech... completely forgettable. But I agree that it didn't apply the rest, and taken as a whole it was a decent speech. So don't get your panties in a twist... I think it would have been much stronger if she'd either cut down the opening bit by about 70%, or sprinkled it in smaller chunks throughout the rest of the speech.
I'll reserve further judgment until I've actually heard it for real.
Thanks for the link.